| 👍 T-64 | 👎 T-72 | |
|---|---|---|
Firepower | 🔥 Advanced Main Armament The T-64 is equipped with the 125mm smoothbore gun D-81T (also known as 2A46), which provides superior accuracy, penetration, and range compared to the T-72's gun. This allows the T-64 to engage and defeat heavily armored targets with ease. For example, the T-64 can fire 9K112 Kobra gun-launched anti-tank guided missiles, providing it with a versatile and lethal anti-armor capability. | 💥 Less Capable Main Armament The T-72 is equipped with a less advanced main armament compared to the T-64. Its 125mm smoothbore gun lacks the same level of accuracy, penetration, and range as the T-64's gun. This puts the T-72 at a disadvantage when engaging heavily armored targets, as its firepower may not be effective enough to penetrate their armor. Additionally, the T-72 lacks the capability to fire gun-launched anti-tank guided missiles, limiting its versatility and anti-armor effectiveness.
|
Mobility | 🚀 Higher Power-to-Weight Ratio The T-64 has a higher power-to-weight ratio, allowing for better acceleration and maneuverability on various terrains compared to the T-72. The 5TDF 5-cylinder diesel engine with 700 horsepower provides the T-64 with excellent mobility, enabling it to quickly traverse challenging terrain and outmaneuver enemy tanks. Furthermore, the advanced suspension system of the T-64 ensures superior stability and smooth ride, enhancing its overall mobility. | 🐢 Lower Power-to-Weight Ratio The T-72 has a lower power-to-weight ratio compared to the T-64, resulting in inferior acceleration and maneuverability. The T-72's engine, although still capable, generates less power (exact horsepower not provided) compared to the T-64's engine. As a result, the T-72 may struggle to keep up with more agile tanks on various terrains, potentially putting it at a disadvantage in dynamic battlefield situations. The T-72's suspension system also lacks the advanced features of the T-64's, which may affect its stability and ride quality.
|
Protection | 🛡️ Advanced Armor Technology The T-64 incorporates innovative armor technologies, including the Nizh explosive reactive armor (ERA). This advanced ERA significantly enhances the tank's protection against anti-tank missiles, shaped charge ammunition, and high-explosive anti-tank rounds. The T-64's unique armor composition and layout also provide improved protection against kinetic energy penetrators. For example, the T-64B version features composite armor, which combines steel, ceramics, and fiberglass layers to enhance its defensive capabilities. | 💔 Less Effective Armor Protection The T-72's armor technology is not as advanced as that of the T-64. While it still offers reasonable protection against conventional threats, the T-72 lacks the advanced features found in the T-64, such as explosive reactive armor (ERA) and composite armor. This makes the T-72 more vulnerable to anti-tank missiles, shaped charge ammunition, and kinetic energy penetrators. Without these advanced armor technologies, the T-72 may struggle to withstand modern anti-tank weapons, reducing its survivability on the battlefield.
|
Modernization Potential | 🔄 Extensive Modernization Capabilities The T-64 has a solid foundation for modernization due to its advanced design and features. Its modular design allows for easy integration of new technologies and systems. For example, Ukraine has successfully transformed at least one T-64 tank into a heavy armored personnel carrier, showcasing the adaptability and versatility of the platform. Additionally, the T-64's hull and chassis can serve as the basis for various specialized variants, such as engineering, recovery, or command vehicles. This flexibility and modernization potential make the T-64 a future-proof choice. | 🛑 Limited Modernization Potential The T-72's design and features limit its modernization potential compared to the T-64. Its older design and less advanced systems make it more challenging to integrate new technologies and capabilities. The lack of a modular design and specific limitations in the hull and chassis may restrict the range of possible modifications and upgrades for the T-72. This limited modernization potential could make the T-72 less adaptable to future battlefield requirements and advancements in technology.
|