| đ T-90M | đ M1A2 Abrams | |
|---|---|---|
Firepower
| đĨ T-90M's Devastating Firepower
The T-90M boasts a formidable 125 mm 2A46 smoothbore main gun, capable of unleashing devastation on the battlefield. This advanced weapon system ensures pinpoint accuracy and penetration power, making it a force to be reckoned with. During recent conflicts, such as the one in Ukraine, the T-90M showcased its firepower resilience, even under intense attacks from Bradley fighting vehicles armed with chain guns. The video evidence of the T-90M enduring such assaults highlights its robust design and the effectiveness of its main gun.
| đĢ M1A2 Abrams's Lackluster Firepower
On the other hand, the M1A2 Abrams falls short in terms of firepower. Its M256 120 mm smoothbore gun, while initially developed by Rheinmetall, doesn't match the destructive capabilities of the T-90M's main gun. The recent footage of a Bradley Fighting Vehicle easily pummeling a T-90M tank further emphasizes the vulnerability of the Abrams. The Abrams' firepower seems inadequate, raising questions about its effectiveness in modern warfare scenarios.
|
Armor Protection
| đĄī¸ T-90M's Impenetrable Armor
The T-90M is equipped with Shtora-1, an advanced defensive system that enhances its already impressive armor protection. This system has proven effective in real combat situations, as seen in engagements where the T-90M successfully withstood attacks. The tank's resilience against Bradley fighting vehicles and other adversaries underscores the effectiveness of its armor, making it a reliable choice on the battlefield.
| đ§ M1A2 Abrams's Flimsy Armor
Contrastingly, the M1A2 Abrams lacks the same level of protection. Despite being considered a modern battle tank, its armor vulnerabilities are exposed in recent conflicts. The ease with which a Bradley Fighting Vehicle mauls the T-90M Breakout tank raises concerns about the Abrams' ability to withstand attacks. The Abrams' armor appears less robust compared to the T-90M, putting it at a disadvantage in terms of survivability.
|
Mobility
| đī¸ T-90M's Agile Maneuverability
The T-90M excels in agility and maneuverability, showcasing its ability to navigate diverse terrains seamlessly. Its V-92S2 engine, coupled with a manual transmission, provides the tank with a powerful and flexible mobility advantage. This was evident in videos displaying the skillful work of Ukrainian mechanized brigades, highlighting the T-90M's ability to swiftly respond to dynamic battlefield situations.
| đ M1A2 Abrams's Clumsy Movement
In contrast, the M1A2 Abrams exhibits a less agile and more cumbersome movement. Its road and cross-country capabilities fall short, limiting its effectiveness in rapidly changing combat scenarios. The footage of Ukrainian troops successfully destroying a T-90M tank using two Bradley vehicles further emphasizes the Abrams' challenges in keeping up with more agile adversaries.
|
Technological Advancements
| đ T-90M's Cutting-Edge Technology
The T-90M integrates modern technologies seamlessly, such as the 1A45T fire-control system. This system enhances target acquisition and tracking, providing the crew with a significant advantage on the battlefield. The tank's technological prowess is evident in its participation in events like the Tank Biathlon, showcasing its reliability and cutting-edge features.
| đšī¸ M1A2 Abrams's Outdated Technology
Regrettably, the M1A2 Abrams lags behind in terms of technological advancements. Despite being approved for production in 1990, recent developments indicate a focus on upgrading to meet challenges. The decision to end the M1A2 System Enhancement Package version 4 program reflects the tank's struggle to keep up with the evolving demands of modern warfare, leaving it with outdated technology.
These aspects collectively paint a picture of the T-90M's superiority in firepower, armor protection, mobility, and technological advancements compared to the M1A2 Abrams, which faces challenges in each of these critical areas. |